Recruitment, Consent and DNA Sample Acquisition in a U.S. Precision Health Cohort During the COVID-19 Pandemic (preprint)

Aim: The Yale Generations Project (YGP) is a precision health cohort initiative that began enrollment in New Haven Connecticut USA in July 2019. In March 2020, after nine months of operation, pandemic restrictions prompted abrupt changes to staff availability as well as changes to the projects recruitment, consenting, and sample acquisition. This manuscript describes the successful addition of remote recruitment, consenting, and DNA sampling to YGP workflows during the initial 27-months of pandemic restrictions ending June 30, 2022. Methods: The initial YGP protocol established face-to-face workflow for recruiting, consenting and peripheral blood collection. A telemedicine consent protocol was initiated in April of 2020, and a remote saliva collection was established in October of 2020. De-identified data was extracted from YGP dataset and reported here. Results: At the completion of YGPs initial 36 months (9-months pre-pandemic and 27-months pandemic) YGP enrolled N=4949 volunteers. There were N=1,950 (216.7 per month) volunteers consented pre-pandemic and N=2,999 (111.1 per month) during pandemic. The peak consenting month was February 2020 with N=428. DNA sample acquisition peaked in the pre-pandemic month of February 2020 with N=291 peripheral blood draws, and in the pandemic period the peak DNA acquisition month was November 2020 with N=176 (N=68 peripheral blood draws and N=108 saliva samples). Conclusion: The YGP successfully transitioned from pre-pandemic recruiting, consenting and sample acquisition model that was exclusively face-to-face, to pandemic model that was predominantly remote. The added value of remote recruiting, consenting, and sampling has led to plans for an optimized hybrid model post-pandemic. Keywords: genomics, precision health, COVID-19, cohort

Microfluidic immuno-serology assay revealed a limited diversity of protection against COVID-19 in patients with altered immunity (preprint)

The immune response to SARS-CoV-2 for patients with altered immunity such as hematologic malignancies and autoimmune disease may differ substantially from that in general population. These patients remain at high risk despite wide-spread adoption of vaccination. It is critical to examine the differences at the systems level between the general population and the patients with altered immunity in terms of immunologic and serological responses to COVID-19 infection and vaccination. Here, we developed a novel microfluidic chip for high-plex immuno-serological assay to simultaneously measure up to 50 plasma or serum samples for up to 50 soluble markers including 35 plasma proteins, 11 anti-spike/RBD IgG antibodies spanning all major variants, and controls. Our assay demonstrated the quintuplicate test in a single run with high throughput, low sample volume input, high reproducibility and high accuracy. It was applied to the measurement of 1,012 blood samples including in-depth analysis of sera from 127 patients and 21 healthy donors over multiple time points, either with acute COVID infection or vaccination. The protein association matrix analysis revealed distinct immune mediator protein modules that exhibited a reduced degree of diversity in protein-protein cooperation in patients with hematologic malignancies and patients with autoimmune disorders receiving B cell depletion therapy. Serological analysis identified that COVID infected patients with hematologic malignancies display impaired anti-RBD antibody response despite high level of anti-spike IgG, which could be associated with limited clonotype diversity and functional deficiency in B cells and was further confirmed by single-cell BCR and transcriptome sequencing. These findings underscore the importance to individualize immunization strategy for these high-risk patients and provide an informative tool to monitor their responses at the systems level.

Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Personal Networks and Neurological Outcomes of People with Multiple Sclerosis: A Case-Control Cross-sectional and Longitudinal Analysis (preprint)

BackgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic has negatively impacted the social fabric of people with multiple sclerosis (pwMS). ObjectiveTo evaluate the associations between personal social network environment and neurological function in pwMS and controls during the COVID-19 pandemic and compare with the pre-pandemic baseline. MethodsWe first analyzed data collected from 8 cohorts of pwMS and control participants during the COVID-19 pandemic (March-December 2020). We then leveraged data collected between 2017-2019 in 3 of the 8 cohorts for longitudinal comparison. Participants completed a questionnaire that quantified the structure and composition of their personal social network, including the health behaviors of network members. We assessed neurological disability using three interrelated patient-reported outcomes: Patient Determined Disease Steps (PDDS), Multiple Sclerosis Rating Scale - Revised (MSRS-R), and Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)-Physical Function. We identified the network features associated with neurologic disability using paired t-tests and covariate-adjusted regressions. ResultsIn the cross-sectional analysis of the pandemic data from 1130 pwMS and 1250 control participants, higher percent of network members with a perceived negative health influence was associated with greater neurological symptom burden in pwMS (MSRS-R: Beta[95% CI]=2.181[1.082, 3.279], p<.001) and worse physical function in controls (PROMIS-Physical Function: Beta[95% CI]=-5.707[-7.405, -4.010], p<.001). In the longitudinal analysis of 230 pwMS and 136 control participants, the percent of people contacted "weekly or less" (p<.001) decreased during the COVID-19 pandemic for both pwMS (30.34% to 18.78%) and controls (23.48% to 14.89%) when compared to the pre-pandemic period. PwMS further experienced a greater reduction in network size (p<.001), increase in constraint (a measure of close ties of the network, p<.001) and decrease in maximum degree (highest number of ties of a network member, p<.001) than controls during the COVID-19 pandemic. These changes in network features were not associated with worsening neurological disability during the pandemic. ConclusionsOur findings suggest that negative health influences in personal social networks are associated with worse disability in all participants, and the COVID-19 pandemic led to contraction of personal social networks to a greater extent for pwMS than controls.